Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




 Log In  | Sign Up  |  Contact      






Do You Want Your Quarterback Playing From Behind?



By Steve Schwarz | 8/5/23

I’ve have heard from many a fantasy player… “I get more fantasy points when my quarterback is behind on the scoreboard and playing catch up. And even better when he is down late in a game and the other team is in a “prevent defense”. But is that true or just an old fantasy player’s tall tale?

And how could this information help you when drafting a fantasy team?

It’s particularly important if the quarterback doesn’t have a good defense behind him.

There is nothing better than your quarterback getting into a shootout. Think of Dak Prescott’s first four games in 2020. His Cowboys’ defense (pre-Micah Parsons) couldn’t stop my old high school team. They game up 136 points in those four games (36.5 PPG). So, Dak was forced to run and pass every chance he got and racked up 147.1 fantasy points (36.8 FPts/G) before getting knocked out of the game, and the season, in the first quarter of the fifth game.

Therefore, one of our goals should be to find a quality quarterback, who thrives playing from behind on a team with a weak defense.

The first box below shows each expected 2023 starter’s Quarterback Rating when ahead or tied on the scoreboard versus when they are behind.

Five teams gave up 425 points or more last season (25 PPG allowed). They were Indianapolis in the AFC and Chicago, Arizona, Minnesota and Detroit in the NFC. Is it any wonder why three of the quarterbacks ranked among the top-10? Kirk Cousins, Jared Goff and Justin Fields were always playing catchup. Cousins was the least efficient of the three with an 87.7 QB rating in that situation while Fields and Goff had better than a 90 rating. Will any of their teams have improved defenses in 2023? If not, then these quarterbacks are still good options for this year.

We also want guys who can respond in the fourth quarter even if they have struggled all day. Late points, particularly when defenses are in “prevent,” frequently win weekends for fantasy owners.

Anyone old enough to remember a certain Peyton Manning comeback against a great Tampa Bay Bucs defense on a Monday night in October of 2003? The Warren Sapp-led defense (also John Lynch and Ronde Barber in the secondary) held a 28-7 lead heading into the fourth quarter when Manning led a crazy comeback to win 38-35 in OT. Manning had produced just 144 passing yards through three quarters but amassed 242 yards and a score in the fourth quarter and one drive in overtime.

The second box is guys who played well at crunch time when their team was down on the scoreboard. Lamar Jackson was elite. Tua Tagovailoa too. And Jalen Hurts, who was not very good when his team was behind early, obviously flipped a switch in the fourth quarter and became “Superman,” producing a league-best 139.8 QB Rating in the fourth quarter and overtime. So, fantasy owners who start Hurts might actually be hoping all those changes to the Eagles’ 2023 defense don’t work out as well as Eagles fans and management hope.

Other viable fantasy starters, whose team finished in the bottom third in scoring defense include; Miami and Tagovailoa along with Seattle and Geno Smith. Tagovailoa played very well from behind (110.0 QB rating overall and 124.5 in the fourth quarter and overtime, while Smith produced 103.4 and 110.9, respectively.

But do we want our quarterback ALWAYS playing from behind?

The answer is definitively – NO!

A few years back, I analyzed 10 years of data with quarterbacks playing on teams who finished the season with a minus 80 points differential. There were 75 such teams and a total of 171 quarterbacks who started for them and just 13 quarterbacks managed to average 20.4 FPts/G (then the minimum production needed to produce a top-12 result). That’s just 7.6%.

In contrast, the 74 teams with a plus 80 differential (including 92 quarterbacks) over the same time frame, produced 48 quarterbacks with QB1-worthy production (52.2%).

Last season, six teams posted +80 point differential-or-better and five of them had QB1 quarterbacks: Buffalo, Kansas City, Cincinnati, Philadelphia and Dallas. Only the 49ers (league-leading +173) didn’t have a fantasy-worthy quarterback… they just had a monster defense and Christian McCaffrey.

At the other end of the spectrum, three of four teams with negative 80 differential in 2022 (Houston, Indianapolis, Arizona and Chicago) didn’t have a QB1 with only “da Bears” and Fields making the list.

 QB Rating - Ahead vs. Behind - Full Game
Year Player Team Ahead
QB Rating
Behind
QB Rating
Variance
1 Lamar Jackson BAL 87.2 107.1 19.9
2 Justin Fields CHI 73.9 91.9 18.0
3 Russell Wilson DEN 74.8 90.6 15.8
4 Patrick Mahomes KC 100.8 114.3 13.5
5 Aaron Rodgers NYJ 84.8 96.4 11.6
6 Tua Tagovailoa MIA 101.5 110.0 8.5
7 Derek Carr NO 82.6 89.8 7.2
8 Geno Smith SEA 98.4 103.4 5.0
9 Desmond Ridder ATL 82.2 87.2 5.0
10 Daniel Jones NYG 89.7 94.5 4.8
11 Joe Burrow CIN 99.2 103.5 4.3
12 Baker Mayfield 2 teams 77.1 80.4 3.3
13 Mac Jones NEP 83.2 86.0 2.8
14 Trevor Lawrence JAX 94.6 95.7 1.1
15 Justin Herbert LAC 92.7 93.8 1.1
16 Josh Allen BUF 96.5 97.0 0.5
17 Ryan Tannehill TEN 95.2 93.4 -1.8
18 Jimmy Garoppolo LV 104.8 100.2 -4.6
19 Matthew Stafford LAR 90.1 85.5 -4.6
20 Jared Goff DET 101.4 96.6 -4.8
21 Dak Prescott DAL 93.2 88.3 -4.9
22 Kenny Pickett PIT 79.7 74.8 -4.9
23 Kyler Murray ARI 92.1 86.1 -6.0
24 Deshaun Watson CLE 83.0 74.7 -8.3
25 Jalen Hurts PHI 103.1 94.1 -9.0
26 Kirk Cousins MIN 97.0 87.7 -9.3
27 Brock Purdy SF 109.7 98.4 -11.3
28 rookie CAR
29 rookie HOU
30 rookie IND
31 Jordan Love GB * * *
32 Sam Howell WAS *  *

- Min 20 attempts both ahead and behind

 QB Rating - Ahead vs. Behind - 4th Qtr/OT Only
Year Player Team Ahead
QB Rating
Behind
QB Rating
Variance
1 Lamar Jackson BAL 60.0 132.8 72.8
2 Tua Tagovailoa MIA 61.9 124.5 62.6
3 Jalen Hurts PHI 92.0 139.8 47.8
4 Josh Allen BUF 68.4 94.0 25.6
5 Russell Wilson DEN 61.1 84.8 23.7
6 Baker Mayfield 2 teams 64.1 82.4 18.3
7 Patrick Mahomes KC 84.8 102.2 17.4
8 Geno Smith SEA 96.1 110.9 14.8
9 Aaron Rodgers NYJ 76.1 83.3 7.2
10 Justin Fields CHI 61.6 67.6 6.0
11 Justin Herbert LAC 82.5 87.1 4.6
12 Kenny Pickett PIT 67.5 69.9 2.4
13 Ryan Tannehill TEN 95.7 97.9 2.2
14 Trevor Lawrence JAX 86.0 86.7 0.7
15 Daniel Jones NYG 80.7 79.1 -1.6
16 Jared Goff DET 102.9 99.5 -3.4
17 Desmond Ridder ATL 95.6 91.9 -3.7
18 Dak Prescott DAL 101.8 98.1 -3.7
19 Joe Burrow CIN 117.6 110.8 -6.8
20 Kirk Cousins MIN 108.9 101.6 -7.3
21 Jimmy Garoppolo LV 99.5 91.4 -8.1
22 Mac Jones NEP 86.8 70.1 -16.7
23 Derek Carr NO 88.7 70.7 -18.0
24 Matthew Stafford LAR 96.2 53.2 -43.0
25 Deshaun Watson CLE 110.8 66.1 -44.7
26 Kyler Murray ARI 124.5 75.9 -49.6
27 Brock Purdy SF 89.2 19.5 -69.7
28 rookie CAR
29 rookie HOU
30 rookie IND
31 Jordan Love GB * * *
32 Sam Howell WAS *  *  *

* - not enough data to evaluate

By-the-way that Brock Purdy 19.5 Rating is correct, but, they weren’t behind much down the stretch last season – just twice in his nine games. (He went 4-of-11 for 66 yards, zero TDs and 1 INT when behind late in those two games)





Draft Buddy - Fantasy Football excel draft spreadsheet