My final two postseason columns will feature my weekly DFS prognostications.
DraftKings
Below you will find my position-by-position projections. Please
note I have included DraftKings' dollar value for each player,
followed by his projected point total. Each position is sorted
by my DraftKings' projected point total
Key for quarterbacks, running
backs, receivers and tight ends: P Yds - Passing Yards P TD - Passing Touchdowns INT - Interceptions Ru Yds - Rushing Yards Ru TD - Rushing Touchdowns Rec Yds - Receiving Yards Rec TD - Receiving Touchdowns Rec - Receptions
Matthew
Stafford - Playoff football is rarely
played in ideal conditions. The Rams should not expect to get them
in Seattle this weekend either. However, this weekend's forecast
suggests the game will be played around 40° with a slight chance
of rain and minimal wind, which would make this game the best setup
the Rams have had in the playoffs thus far. The reason this is noteworthy
is that Stafford has completed just over 50 percent of his passes
in questionable conditions against the Panthers and frigid conditions
versus the Bears. With that said, Stafford still threw for 304 yards
and three touchdowns in Carolina against one of the best pass defenses
in the league. As for last week, just remember the game in Chicago
the next time someone tells you that playing in the cold doesn't
mean all that much. The Bears offered very little resistance as
a pass defense for most of the season and just gave up four TD passes
to Jordan Love the week before.
It is difficult to read too much into Stafford's performances
in his two meetings against the Seahawks this season. The first
matchup (in Week 11) was a Rams home win in a game they could
have easily lost despite being on the right side of a plus-three
turnover differential. It was one of the few times all season
in which Stafford attempted fewer than 30 passes, which partially
explains why he only threw for 130 yards. However, do not let
the failures of Sam Darnold (four interceptions) in that particular
contest change the narrative of what actually happened that day:
the Seahawks played well enough to win, especially on defense.
Their goal this week will be to do many of the things they did
in that game while also trying to minimize how often they have
to throw. The second meeting (Week 16) was one the Rams had no
business losing, giving up three touchdowns and three two-point
conversions over the last eight minutes of regulation and 6:47
of overtime to drop a 38-37 decision. (That game was played in
some rain with a game-time temperature of 52° and a 16 MPH wind,
for what it's worth.) While it certainly did not hurt Stafford's
cause that he attempted a season-high 49 passes, the Seahawks
seemed powerless at times trying to slow him down (457 yards passing
and three touchdowns).
Three common threads in the two meetings: Stafford did not take
a sack. He did not throw an interception either, but he also failed
to complete 60 percent of his passes in both games. I highlight
these three areas for one primary reason: if there is an offense
that has proven that it can solve Seattle's defense, it is Sean
McVay's group. With that said, do not expect great efficiency
from Stafford this week. In the eight games that starting quarterbacks
failed to complete 60 percent of their passes against the Seahawks,
five of them have happened since Week 9 (including both games
versus the Rams). All of this is to say that while Stafford is
understandably the highest-priced quarterback on the board this
week, he is a bet on volume against a defense that has not been
a great matchup for quarterbacks.
Drake
Maye - What approach does New England
take against Denver this week? Go pass-heavy against arguably
the best pass defense in the league (league-low 4.8 net yards
per pass attempt during the regular season) that has recorded
71 sacks in 18 games and has allowed Maye to be sacked 57 times
in 19 contests? Or do the Patriots grind it out as long as possible
to avoid that and take their chances that a Jarrett Stidham-led
offense cannot score more than 10-13 points at home? It makes
for a fascinating discussion on any number of levels and certainly
for those of us on the DFS streets. It seems counterintuitive
to rely LESS on a second-year quarterback who is one of the two
top candidates for league MVP and instead rely on a running back
with a history of ball security issues (Rhamondre Stevenson) and
a rookie (TreVeyon Henderson) who has struggled to hit the big
play for more than a month and isn't being used very often as
a receiver lately. On the other hand, Maye has taken 10 sacks,
thrown two interceptions and fumbled six times (three lost) in
two playoff games. Can the Broncos honestly expect to score more
than 20 points unless they get a defensive touchdown? If not,
why tempt fate by putting it in the hands MORE OFTEN of the one
player who has proven he could allow that to happen?
The Patriots obviously cannot stray too far from the model that
got them to the AFC Championship either. Maye has not attempted
30 passes in the last four games, in part because the defense
has not allowed more than 16 points and Stevenson has run the
ball well during that stretch. Maye can obviously help in that
regard as well with six games of at least 40 yards rushing this
season. The fact that he is the only quarterback left in the pool
who offers much in the way of upside as a runner gives him a chance
at being worth his price tag in DFS. The problem with that is
we need him to be more like his regular-season self and not someone
who just climbs over 200 yards passing with one touchdown and
a meager amount of rushing yards.
Jarrett
Stidham - I intend to enter the
most lineups I ever have in DFS this week. Stidham will probably
not appear on more than five percent of them. The last time he
played any meaningful football was in Week 18 of the 2023 season.
The best game of his NFL career came the previous year, as he
stunned a playoff-bound San Francisco defense with three touchdown
passes in a 37-34 overtime loss to the 49ers in his first start
of the season following an injury to Derek Carr. HC Sean Payton
has been a big fan of his since then (and perhaps before), which
is a big part of the reason why he has served as Payton's primary
backup quarterback in every one of Payton's three seasons with
the club. We know the possibility exists that he could throw for
multiple touchdowns because he has already done so in one of his
four career starts.
The problem with putting much faith in him is that C.J. Stroud
became the first quarterback since Week 10 to throw for more than
200 yards versus the Patriots (and that came with four interceptions).
Josh Allen (three touchdowns in Week 15) is the only quarterback
since Justin Fields in Week 11 to account for more than one score
against New England. While it needs to be noted that the Patriots
have not exactly faced a who's who of quarterbacks lately, Stidham
is among the least accomplished of that group. It might be a different
story if he offered much of a run threat, but he does not. (He
ran for at least 34 yards in two of his career starts, for what
it is worth.) He has done enough in the box score in each of his
four starts (at least 200 yards passing and a touchdown in each
one) to warrant punt status in DFS. However, the Patriots will
be the best defense he has faced and the AFC Championship is a
much different stage than the meaningless Week 17 and Week 18
starts he was making for the Raiders and Broncos at the end of
the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
Sam Darnold
- One could make the assertion that Seattle has been
trying to hide Darnold as much during its eight-game winning streak
as it has asked him to manage each game. (One simple stat that
reflects this notion: he has thrown for only nine TDs during the
streak.) Then again, it would also be fair to say the running
game and defense have been operating at such a high level that
he has not been needed to do much. What seems clear this weekend
is that he will be needed to contribute in a meaningful way if
the Seahawks are going to win the rubber match of this NFC West
series. Nearly half of Darnold's interceptions this year (six
of 14) came in two games against Los Angeles, which obviously
does not bode well for anyone having much optimism in his ability
to be the difference - in a positive way - for the Seahawks.
Working in his favor has been the gradual demise of the Rams'
defense, specifically against the run. (I will discuss this more
in the next section.) Los Angeles gave up half of its passing
touchdowns over the final six weeks of the regular-season (13
of 26) despite facing the likes of Bryce Young (twice), Jacoby
Brissett (twice), Jared Goff, Darnold and Kirk Cousins. Mac Jones
(twice) and Jalen Hurts were the only quarterbacks to account
for more than two touchdowns against this defense before Week
13. If we include the playoffs, Cousins is the only one who hasn't
since. The Rams will have their hands full trying to contain the
Seahawks' improved rushing attack, so they won't have the luxury
of rushing four and playing seven very often unless they jump
out to an early lead. As a result, I am willing to give Darnold
a puncher's chance of being the highest-scoring quarterback on
the slate this week if he can finally get a bead on DC Chris Shula's
defense.
Kenneth
Walker - If it had to happen, Zach
Charbonnet's ACL injury came about two months too late for most
of Walker's fantasy managers. The funny thing about Walker's 145-yard,
three-touchdown performance last week is that his two best fantasy
efforts since September had come against the Rams (111 total yards
and a touchdown in Week 11 and 164 total yards and a touchdown
in Week 16). In the 11 other games he played during the regular
season since Week 4, Walker averaged 66.5 total yards and scored
ZERO touchdowns. In other words, if you saw last week coming for
Walker, you are a damn fool who got lucky with the Charbonnet
injury or believed in the "hot hand" (133 total yards in Week
18 versus the 49ers) even though Charbonnet outscored Walker in
fantasy that week and entered the game with a firm grasp on the
goal-line role. None of that matters now, as Walker figures to
handle the overwhelming bulk of the workload for however long
Seattle remains alive. George Holani appears to be the most likely
Seahawk to handle whatever work Walker doesn't, but this should
be KWIII's show the rest of the way.
What has changed for Walker for him to produce as well as he
has lately? As is usually the case with football, multiple factors
have contributed to his rise. As mentioned earlier, Seattle has
fully committed to the running game. The line is blocking better.
(While yards before contact is not exclusively a line-blocking
stat, Walker has been over three yards per carry before contact
in three of his last four games after only hitting that mark five
times prior. He topped that mark in both of his games versus the
Rams, for what it is worth.) Walker is becoming a
more disciplined runner and the Seahawks have involved him
more in the passing game. Two good games against the Rams this
year do not guarantee anything this weekend, but it is hard to
imagine a scenario in which Seattle moves on to the Super Bowl
and Walker is not a huge part of it happening.
Kyren
Williams/Blake
Corum - Corum performed too well during the regular-season
to be dismissed for DFS purposes during the NFL Playoffs. With
that said, it is difficult to consider him anything more than
a punt play given how often he plays about a third of the snaps.
He is also rarely on the field on passing downs. I will probably
max out my exposure to him around 10-12 percent to prevent a repeat
of what happened last week when I went all-in on Charbonnet. The
problem with putting too much on Corum is that he likely needs
to rush for 70 yards and a touchdown to be worth his $5,000 price
tag and I don't see either of those things happening against the
third-stingiest run defense in the league during the regular season.
The Seahawks also allowed the fewest total touchdowns to the running
back position (seven).
Barring a situation in which the Rams are in negative game script
all day long (which should lead to several check-downs in theory),
this week does not figure to be a ceiling game for Williams. What
he has provided his fantasy managers all season, though, is a
very high floor - regardless of the opponent. He ran for more
yards against Seattle (91 yards in Week 11) than any other player
this season and handled 26 touches in the second meeting five
weeks later. Williams has been trusted with 13 touches in every
outing this season and is coming off a 25-touch outing in Chicago
- one shy of the season high he set in the Week 16 loss to the
Seahawks. Los Angeles has consistently stuck to the run, even
on the rare occasion it has not been working. Williams may be
a volume-based floor play this week - which is not exactly ideal
when the running back is the highest-priced one available - but
he is also the least likely one to disappoint his managers as
well.
Rhamondre
Stevenson/TreVeyon
Henderson - I highlighted the dilemma of these two
backs above when discussing Drake Maye. The first question that
needs to be addressed is how the Patriots intend to attack offensively.
Do they rely heavily on Maye to jump out to an early lead and
force Jarrett Stidham to try and beat them? Or do they try to
ride the running game while Maye regains some confidence with
all of the sacks he has taken and turnovers he has been responsible
for during the playoffs? My bet will be on the latter, if only
because the Denver defense is so good at rushing the passer. I
am not sure there is a certain style that is better suited for
running on the Broncos. However, it may not be a coincidence that
Jonathan Taylor, Omarion Hampton, Josh Jacobs, Cam Skattebo and
Javonte Williams are the five backs who have scored the most fantasy
points against them this season. All of them are powerful backs
who also contribute in the passing game. While Henderson can run
with power, recent history obviously favors Stevenson as the type
of back who is more likely to succeed against Denver.
For all we know, Stevenson and Henderson could be this week's
Walker and Charbonnet. One of them gets hurt and the other one
explodes, sending the DFS players who went heavy on the wrong
one into a panic and leaving the other ones rejoicing. For each
of the last five weeks, the right choice in this backfield has
been Stevenson. Denver's recent history against bigger backs would
suggest Stevenson is the play again this week, as would the usage.
The veteran holds a 33-23 advantage in touches during the playoffs,
including a 7-2 edge in catches. For a team that will probably
play this game as conservatively as one would expect a Mike Vrabel-led
team to play, I would expect to have twice as much exposure to
Stevenson as Henderson. (Imagine saying that a month or two ago.)
Another problem with anyone backing Henderson this week is that
he has given us so little to hang our hopes on lately. Yes, he
has scored at least two touchdowns in four games since the start
of November. It is also true that those are the only games in
which he has reached the end zone. He has failed to post two receptions
or 10 receiving yards in five straight as well.
RJ Harvey/J.K.
Dobbins - Make no mistake about it, the Broncos made
it to the AFC Championship in spite of their rushing attack, not
because of it. Harvey has been productive as a receiver and touchdown
scorer and was certainly a fantasy force over the second half
of his rookie season, which means he fulfilled some of the promise
that made HC Sean Payton gush about him last spring. As a lead
running back, however, it has been more bad than good since Dobbins
was injured in Week 10. Harvey is averaging 3.4 yards per carry
behind mostly the same line that helped Dobbins average 5.0. Harvey
was drafted to bring a big-play element to the running game; he
has exactly nine explosive runs (10-plus yards) on 152 carries,
including one of more than 15 yards since Oct. 26. While some
of the blame should be placed on an offensive line that has failed
to block as well as it could have for him, Harvey's two-month
run as the lead back suggests he may be better suited for a 1B
role for the foreseeable future.
Does that mean Dobbins is the 1A, particularly this week following
such a long layoff? Not necessarily, primarily because of how
much time he has missed. If there is a player we have learned
not to doubt following a serious injury, though, it might be Dobbins.
With that said, New England has proven to be a bear against the
run in just about every game it has had a healthy Milton Williams.
Making matters worse this week is the likelihood that the Patriots
will sell out to stop the run and try to make Stidham beat them.
Asking Dobbins to handle 15 touches right away after such a long
layoff is one thing. Asking him to do it against a very good run
defense that will be expecting a heavy dose of the ground game
because the (new) quarterback does not scare anyone is another
thing entirely. I will have Dobbins in a few lineups, only because
he does have theoretical 15-touch upside in this game and comes
at a low cost ($4,000). I will also have some exposure to Harvey
because there is a world where he catches 6-8 passes this weekend.
However, counting on either one as a lineup staple is a losing
proposition.
Rams receivers -
My mistake regarding Puka Nacua's huge projection last week was
not accounting enough for the weather. It appears the conditions
will not be nearly as much of a factor in the NFC Championship.
Barring something that borders on the bizarre, the Seahawks probably
will not have much choice but to do their best to limit what Nacua
does after the catch because they have not enjoyed much success
in limiting his ability to get open and make catches (19 catches
on 24 targets for 300 yards and two touchdowns) in their two meetings.
Nacua's $9,000 price tag should keep his ownership somewhat reasonable
this week, so the question with him this week is if HC Sean McVay
continues to funnel him targets all over the field regardless
of the presence of red zone fiend Davante Adams - as he did against
Carolina in the Wild Card Round - or reverts to his usage of Nacua
before Davante Adams' Week 15 hamstring injury. I will probably limit
my exposure to him to around 60 percent, but there is no question
in my mind that he can live up to his price tag and then some
if the Rams want to force the issue with him.
I will not pretend to understand why Adams seems to be such an
afterthought in the offense so far this postseason. He has yet
to see a target in the first quarter in either of the games and
has been thrown to only seven times in the first half. While I
will acknowledge that his matchups on the perimeter are usually
more difficult than the ones Nacua faces when he moves inside,
Adams is still much too skilled at getting open regardless of
his individual matchup or the type of coverage he is facing. We
don't have nearly as much information regarding how Adams will
fare in this matchup as we do with every other Ram because he
missed the Week 16 matchup. All we have is the Week 11 meeting,
when he somehow managed to catch only one of eight targets (for
a 1-yard touchdown). Tariq Woolen was his primary matchup in that
game and will probably be his primary defender in this matchup
as well. It makes more sense for Woolen to use his 6-4, 205-pound
frame against the smooth-and-silky Adams (as opposed to the more
physical Nacua). Even with Woolen playing well and being one of
the few corners in the league who can legitimately keep Adams
from scoring near the goal line, it would be a mistake if the
Rams do not try to get the 33-year-old going sooner than they
have during the playoffs.
Seahawks receivers - While I believe I have
learned my lesson of completely disregarding any key player in
an offense, I will have a hard time playing any receiver not named
Jaxon Smith-Njigba in this passing game this week. Seattle shockingly
targeted Cooper Kupp early last week, which allowed him to post
a double-digit fantasy total for only the second time since Week
6. Negative game script (the Seahawks' last two losses) led to
two of Kupp's highest target totals this season, but I'm not in
the business of putting a lot of faith into a receiver that has
greatly outperformed his DFS price point once in 17 games this
season. While I could be more inclined to roll the dice on Rashid Shaheed since he can score on special teams and only needs one
deep shot to be a good DFS play, Seattle has not used him nearly
as often offensively as most expected since he was acquired in
early November. Worse yet, he is more expensive than Kupp ($3,800)
at $4,100.
This brings us back to Smith-Njigba. Unlike the Seahawks (who
have multiple studs at cornerback), the Rams have no one in their
secondary who represents more than a speedbump for JSN. If you
need proof, look no further than what he did in the first two
games versus the Rams (9-105-0 and 8-96-1). If you need more proof,
look no further than what Los Angeles has given up to big and/or
good perimeter receivers since Week 12:
Jalen Coker - 4-74-1 in Week 13 and 9-134-1 in the Wild Card
Round
Michael Wilson - 11-142-2 in Week 14 and 5-99-1 in Week 18
Amon-Ra St. Brown/Jameson Williams - 13-164-2 and 7-134-1 in Week
15
Smith-Njigba - 8-96-1 in Week 16
Game script and Kenneth Walker's ability to continue lighting
up the Rams will determine what JSN's ceiling will be this week.
I imagine he will be in more of my lineups than Nacua since he
is $1,000 cheaper, although it would not surprise me at all if
both of them appear in more than half of my entries. There is
such a vast difference between their ceiling and just about every
other player on the board (regardless of position).
Note: I am not sure either game ends up being a shootout,
but I feel much more confident Rams-Seahawks will offer more offensive
fireworks than the Broncos-Patriots, so most of the receivers
I use will likely come from this game.
Broncos receivers -Courtland Sutton ($5,700)
was already going to be a player I was not going to have much
exposure even with a healthy Bo Nix, but I cannot imagine him
appearing in more than five percent of my lineups with Jarrett
Stidham as his quarterback. Sutton would likely be Stidham's favorite
target under most circumstances, but the receiver will likely
have the unenviable task of trying to shake Christian Gonzalez's
shadow coverage. Based on early practice reports, Pat Bryant (suffered
his second concussion in about a month last week) appears more
likely to play than Troy Franklin (hamstring). If this ends up
playing out as it appears it will, I will have no problem using
Bryant or Marvin Mims - in that order - as my low-cost WR3
in the majority of my Nacua-JSN lineups. With Sutton likely in
for a long day, I feel confident one of Denver's secondary receivers
will lead the team in receiving versus New England. What that
actually means with Stidham under center is another story. I am
reasonably confident Denver will score at least one touchdown
in this contest, but I would bet against two.
Patriots receivers - There is no guarantee that
Stidham will make any Bronco pass-catcher viable this week. The
problem for managers when it comes to the Patriots is that any
one of five wideouts could end up being the best DFS play, and
that assumes Mack Hollins (abdomen) remains on IR. Stefon Diggs
($5,800) would be the best bet to make under most circumstances,
but he is far too expensive for a player who lacks multi-touchdown
upside - especially one tied to an offense that may not throw
it more than 20 times. Although Kayshon Boutte ($4,500) beat Derek
Stingley Jr. for a big-play touchdown last week, he seems like
the most likely New England receiver to face Pat Surtain II most
of the day. There does not seem to be much rhyme or reason when
Demario Douglas ($3,600) is going to be a factor. Kyle Williams
($3,500) has flashed big-play potential multiple times this season,
but he has managed only two multi-catch games as a rookie so far.
Although Efton Chism ($3,000) has produced a 20-yard catch or
better in each of his three games with one reception, he is coming
off a game in which he was not targeted. He is also playing less
than a third of the offensive snaps during the playoffs.
Hunter
Henry - Henry is one of only two options
that I would call "palatable." Prior to barely being involved last
week against Houston, Henry was riding a four-game streak in which
he scored in double figures - including three games of at least
13.9 fantasy points. That is typically a benchmark we can live with
from our tight end in the low-to-mid $4,000 range. The only problem
this week is that DraftKings bumped his salary up to $4,800, which
will force almost every manager who wants to have Puka Nacua AND
Jaxon Smith-Njigba in their lineups to look somewhere else. Denver
somehow finished in the middle of the pack against tight ends during
the regular season despite giving up its fair share of big games
to the position. (Zach Ertz went off for 10-106-0 in Week 13 and
Travis Kelce finished with 9-91-1 two weeks earlier.)
As one of the most blitz-happy defenses in the league with a
pair of good cornerbacks, it makes perfect sense why the Broncos
tend to give up big games to the tight end - especially those
who are not seam stretchers. However, we need to ask ourselves
the same question with Henry as we do with virtually every other
Patriot pass-catcher this weekend: Will there be enough volume
for any of them? Henry needs to be in lineups this week, if only
because he has proven he can return some value. There is a lack
of inspiring options at his position after the first two or three.
Colby
Parkinson/Terrance
Ferguson/Tyler
Higbee - Any of these three could hit this weekend
considering how often the Rams are using 13 personnel (three tight
ends), but the only one I will have much faith in rivaling Hunter
Henry is Parkinson. Of course, the only time Parkinson has disappointed
fantasy managers over the last two months was the one time he
was expected to smash the most - in Week 16 versus the Seahawks.
Then again, he could be forgiven a bit in that game since Puka
Nacua was busy drawing 16 of Matthew Stafford's 49 targets. Seattle
also has the personnel at safety to shut down tight ends; it is
more a combination of the Seahawks' coverage schemes and pass
rush that makes their tight end coverage suffer at times. The
Rams also did not have Davante Adams in that contest, which likely
gave Seattle the push it needed to use Nick Emmanwori as often
as it wanted to on Parkinson.
With that said, I am willing to get hurt again. I will have some
exposure to Terrance Ferguson because he is the most talented
tight end of this trio and only needs to catch one of the 1-2
deep targets he should see on Sunday to pay off at his $2,700
price tag. He is also the only other Los Angeles tight end besides
Parkinson to contribute in a major way during a meaningful game
over the last month or two. I will have much more exposure to
Parkinson at $3,500, however. While he has occasionally put up
a dud since going on a touchdown binge starting around Week 10,
the aforementioned Seattle game was the only time he truly disappointed.
Parkinson has regularly attracted seven targets during this stretch
and appears to be Stafford's second-favorite red zone target most
of the time. When you consider he has scored all nine of his touchdowns
this season over the last 11 games, he is easily the best bet
of the tight end group to far exceed his cost.
AJ Barner
- Barner feels like a complete wildcard this week, especially
for a player who caught 52 passes and scored six times during
the regular season. He has become more of an afterthought in recent
weeks, providing fantasy managers with only three meaningful performances
during the second half of the season. Of course, his two best
efforts over that time came in the two games versus the Rams (10-70-0
in Week 11 and 4-49-1 in Week 16). Do with that information what
you will, but I am not sold that he will be worth his $4,000 price
tag this weekend just because he did well against the Rams in
both of the previous meetings. While he will likely be the tight
end I have the second-most exposure to as a lower-cost alternative
to Henry (Parkinson will be the highest), I can also envision
a scenario in which he is needed to block more often - especially
if LT Charles Cross (foot) is limited in any way or ruled out
- and Elijah Arroyo (knee) comes off IR and has a big day.
Evan
Engram - About the only hope fantasy
managers can have with Engram at this point is that the new quarterback
(Jarrett Stidham) leans heavily on him because Sean Payton wants
to get the ball out of Stidham's hands as quickly as possible.
Otherwise, we are talking about a player who has topped 10 fantasy
points twice all season and scored only one touchdown. I am still
dumbfounded as to why the Broncos made such a play for him in
free agency if they did not intend to make him a full-time player,
but here we are. Perhaps I could muster more enthusiasm for him
in DFS if he was priced closer to $2,500, but his $3,300 price
tag is too close to another player who has actual upside and is
not also playing with a backup quarterback (Parkinson). I am sure
I will have about five percent exposure to him, but it feels like
lighting money on fire with him at this point.
Key for defense/special teams units: Bonus - Points allowed
bonus for DraftKings TO - Total turnovers forced TD - Defensive/return touchdowns
Defense / Special
Teams
Team
DK $
Bonus
Sacks
Fum
INT
TD
DK
Patriots
$3,500
4
4
1
1
0
12.0
Broncos
$2,500
1
4
1
1
0
9.0
Rams
$2,800
0
2
0
2
0
6.0
Seahawks
$3,300
0
1
1
0
0
3.0
Doug Orth has served as an analyst for FF Today since 2006 and joined the Fantasy Points team before the start of the 2024 season. He is also a highly successful high-stakes player who has not experienced a losing money season in any of his 25 years in this hobby.