Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      







Staff Writer
Email John

John's Articles

Head Games
1/8/01

It is strange how things go in life. The experts agree it is going to be a hard winter, but the snow barely falls and the temperature never dips below 20 degrees. The NFL pundits have the Rams in the Super Bowl half way through the season, and they make the playoffs by the skin of their teeth only to lose in the first round to the Saints. The Saints lose Blake and Williams and people have them in the grave, but they rose during the season like the Phoenix. At the beginning of the 2000 NFL season all of the fantasy players I know stressed about the lack of running backs in the league, but they have blossomed.

The question is, who will be the first to be wrong about next year's trends and when will they emerge? I would like to be among the first to place my head on the chopping block.

At the beginning of the season there were Faulk, James and everyone else at running back. I did not know anyone who, with confidence, could select five consistent backs. I selected number six in one draft and I was the first to select a wide out. During the previous selection were four running backs and Kurt Warner. In the first round a total of seven picks were running backs, aside from Marvin Harrison and Warner, Peyton Manning was the only other non- rusher taken. All seven of the running backs were standards; James, Faulk, Stephen Davis, Eddie George, T. Davis, E. Smith, Martin, but two out of the six seemed almost to be desperation picks due to the perceived shortage. Terrell Davis was coming off of serious injury and had a terrible season, while Emmitt is a sure third or fourth round pick, but not a first rounder any more. It was obvious there was an air of panic to get the best running backs before they were all gone.

Through the next few rounds the positions selections began to disperse as owners sought to fill out a starting line up and quality back ups. It was not until the final four rounds the panic again set in as people scrambled to snatch up the remaining talent at the running back position. One should take some chances during these rounds, but the choices of Mike Cloud, Napoleon Kaufman, Kimble Anders, Natrone Means and Donnell Bennett are really stretching the envelope. With apologies to the Kansas City Chiefs, none of their running backs are worth a pick because of the team philosophy and almost all of them were taken. Natrone Means has not been a blip on the radar for two years and Napoleon Kaufman has never produced beyond the level of being a free agent selection. During 160 selections of that draft few players dared to take the likes of a Jamal Lewis or Lamar Smith and I doubt the trend was much different across the country.

The likes of James Allen, Ahman Green, Olandis Gary and Mike Anderson were players, picked up in free agency, but they, with the exception of Gary, were not the only backs to emerge in the season 2000. James Stewart had a steady season for Detroit and Mr. Inconsistent, Corey Dillon, had almost equal peaks and valleys. There were a couple of thunder and lightening combinations in the form of Tiki Barber/Ron Dayne and Jamal Lewis/Priest Holmes who were fun to watch. Jerome Bettis once again became, "The Bus" and Lamar Smith, hidden as a Saint, finally brought the Dolphins a running game. It seems the running back position will be a rich vein to mine in the 2001 season as Duce Staley will return, Ricky Williams appears to be coming into his own and everyone should have the problems of the Broncos with Davis, Gary and Anderson. Some teams like the Ravens, Seahawks and 49ers could come close. Perhaps the strength at running back in the NFL has come at the expense of the tight end. There appear to be running backs aplenty, but actual receiving tight ends are a real premium.

Gone are the days of Casper, Winslow, Chester and Jackson. The tight end has evolved into the H-Back or extra blocker to spring the running back or protect the quarterback. With the exception of Tony Gonzalez and Wesley Walls, who made a quick exit to the season, fantasy owners were praying for a tight end who will score a consistent five or six points per week. The last week of the season had four different tight ends scoring, but this was a mirage. When the likes of Freddy Jones, Kyle Brady and Kent Dilger are considered to be prime pick-ups, it may be time for a change in the league format. To this end leagues are considering adopting rules to allow three wide outs in a line up and no tight end. If the NFL can change the rules of defense to promote more offense, why not a fantasy league? An owner could still use a tight at a higher weighting, but the position would be optional in the line up. The demise of the tight end has not been the only change in the NFL, finding a consistent wideout has become the search for the Holy Grail.

Thinking back on the season, I cannot come up with one week in, week out, consistent wide out. There were some outstanding performances, record setting games, but many receivers were limited to a touchdown and minimal yardage, or even worse. Jimmy Smith shined, at times, but suffered through an inconsistent season along with the likes of Issac Bruce, Terrell Owens, Tim Brown and Randy Moss. Even Chris Carter struggled at the beginning of the season and did not really emerge as "The Man" for any league owners receiving corp. Owners next year may be looking to draft wide outs en masse on the bases of match up potential and not the ability to score against "any team." The shift of many teams to the philosophy of defense wins championships, it may take four or more wide outs to have consistent points from the position in 2001. Of course, the effectiveness of any receiver is dependent upon the philosophy of the organization and the ability of the quarterback. This position too has suffered in the aspect of consistency.

The owner who drafted Kurt Warner at the beginning of the season was the only owner to see consistent superior performances, but they only lasted until his injury. The post injury Warner began weak and was only been mortal in finishing the season. There are a lot of solid veterans in the league, but even Brett Favre hardly lit things up and Steve McNair is limited by the system of the organization. There appear to be a lot of teams saying, "Don't make mistakes," as opposed to, "Make it happen." Fiedler in Miami, Collins in New York and, to an extent, Drew Bledsoe in New England have all fallen victim to, "Don't lose it for us, but win the game."

Of course there are seven quarterbacks entering into their third seasons, but Akili Smith and Cade McNown have failed to show any true brilliance and neither one finished out the season as the starter. Daunte Culpepper may be the most productive of the bunch and he plays in a system where three starting quarterbacks have had success in the last three years. Although Aaron Brooks appears to be the real deal, he has not been tested throughout a full season. Steve McNair has led his team during the season, but his numbers have been less than spectacular. He wins any way he can and that means scrambling effectively for first downs. It seems the philosophy of "win ugly" has taken over in many organizations and fantasy owners are going to be hard pressed to find a consistently superior player at quarterback, but there are a lot of ho-hum players in the league. The draft of 2001 would seem vanilla at this position and it may be a place where a savvy owner can sluff and fill in the cracks in the rest of the offense.

In the fantasy draft for the year 2001 consistency will be the thing lacking from almost every team owner. To be effective, owners are really going to have to do their homework and draft according to schedules and divisions. Off-season trades and acquisitions are going to have to be monitored closely as teams attempt to build an offensive line to produce winners. NFL teams may even take the direction of the Ravens and Tampa Bay and under rate their offenses to build defenses that can thwart the lagging offenses now existing in the league. Balance is going to be the key for any success next year as the superstar player takes a back seat to the considerations of the salary cap and free agency. There is a huge side of me that hopes I am wrong. I love having a player who will consistently have twenty or more points a week, but I have lowered my expectations and hope for any group I have playing during a week to each score ten points. Consistency is what will determine next year's fantasy champions, as parody in fantasy football will parallel the NFL. I just see it as a tough goal to achieve. Of course I could be wrong, but I am not going to lose my head over the whole deal.