The first time I saw it in writing was Shawn Siegele’s Zero 
              RB, Antifragility and the Myth of Value Based Drafting. “It” 
              being the potential winning option by just skipping running backs 
              all together early in the draft and depend on the turnover at the 
              position to help you bulk up at the position later, while dominating 
              at wide receiver. 
              This summer, the “Zero RB” bandwagon was full steam 
                ahead, with many people trying to implement it after last season’s 
                many early running back disappointments. I think people missed 
                the big picture by making it the strategy du jour. The big reason 
                Zero RB could have been a successful strategy in the past is because 
                of the potentially dominating group of wide receivers a person 
                could build while everyone else is focusing on early running backs. 
              If everyone is doing Zero RB, the advantage that previously existed 
                is gone. This summer I took part in a bunch of MFL10 best ball 
                leagues, hosted by myfantasyleague.com. 
                Most of my MFL10s have actually resulted in the old school method 
                of loading up at running back. If everyone is taking wide receivers, 
                it’s silly to follow the crowd. Now I wish I thought of that last 
                year when “the crowd” was going with all early running backs. 
              With all that said, I wasn’t skipping out on Zero RB because 
                I didn’t think it looked fun. Wide receivers can be way 
                more exciting picks than running backs. So, when I finally stumbled 
                into an MFL10 that wasn’t full of people blindly following 
                the herd into this new world of early round drafting, I decided 
                it was time to finally give it a shot. 
              Here’s how it shook out: 
                  
                 
               
              QB: Jay 
              Cutler, CHI; Geno 
              Smith, NYJ; Matt 
              Schaub, OAK 
              FFToday’s 
                rankings have Jay Cutler as the No. 11 quarterback heading 
                into the season, so I was excited to be able to nab him in the 
                11th round. I didn’t grab a quarterback any earlier because of 
                all the ground I was looking to make up at the running back position. 
                I timed it perfectly too, because five more quarterbacks went 
                off the board immediately after my Cutler pick, which would have 
                made for slim pickings at the position later.  
              In a normal draft scenario, I tend to not draft a backup quarterback. 
                Since this is a best ball league where I can’t touch my roster, 
                that’s not an option. Geno Smith put up a few big weeks last season, 
                so hopefully he can provide a few more this year. Matt Schaub 
                could be in for an ugly season, but if he can just contribute 
                a couple big weeks, it will be helpful to my cause. He does have 
                a pretty good set of wide receivers, so all might not be lost 
                for Schaub. 
              RB: Stevan 
                Ridley, NE; Frank 
                Gore, SF; Danny 
                Woodhead, SD; Darren 
                McFadden, OAK; Bernard 
                Pierce, BAL 
              As a theory, Zero RB makes a lot of sense. In practice, it can 
                be a scary path. You have to have some risk tolerance to go into 
                a season with no star power at running back. Allow me to guide 
                you through my thinking with each pick as I tried to put together 
                a winning group without drafting any players perceived as studs. 
              Stevan Ridley: I don’t love Ridley, 
                so I generally won’t be the one taking him in a normal draft. 
                Now that I’m deploying a strategy that calls for waiting on running 
                back, I need all the upside I can get. Ridley comes with a lot 
                of downside, but his upside in the Patriots offense is double-digit 
                touchdowns.  
              Frank Gore: It seems like people 
                have been trying to write off Frank Gore for years, yet he still 
                continues roll on. In the seventh round, it’s worth taking a shot 
                that Gore has another year of proving people wrong in him. 
              Danny Woodhead: MFL10 scoring is 
                PPR, so nabbing Woodhead here should be a good get, assuming he 
                continues to pile on receptions in the Chargers offense. I think 
                the combination of Gore and Woodhead will provide me a solid week-to-week 
                base for getting points from the position, while the other three 
                picks are more about potential upside. 
              Darren McFadden: Nobody has ever 
                questioned McFadden’s ability on the football field. His big problem 
                has been staying on the field. He’ll have to split time with Maurice 
                Jones-Drew, but that could actually provide some benefit to 
                McFadden. Less time on the field means less chance of injury. 
                As long as he stays healthy, his big-play ability should be able 
                provide a few big scoring weeks. 
              Bernard Pierce: For the first two 
                weeks of the season, I’ll have a starting running back that I 
                was able to grab in the 10th round. After that, there’s no guarantee 
                Ray 
                Rice takes the job away. If Pierce gets off to a strong start, 
                the Ravens could decide to keep him in the starting role. At the 
                very least, he could force the Ravens to go forward with a true 
                committee approach. Even being stuck in a committee would keep 
                Pierce fantasy relevant. 
              I think if you can come out of your draft with a set of running 
                backs similar to this group, you’ll be happy. If you hit 
                on your early round wide receiver picks, they’ll be carrying 
                your team anyway, so you don’t need to dominate at the running 
                back position. In a standard redraft league, you’ll also 
                have opportunity during the season to fix running back via waivers 
                if there are any injuries that hurt other teams along the way. 
              WR: Demaryius 
                Thomas, DEN; Jordy 
                Nelson, GB; Vincent 
                Jackson, TB; Andre 
                Johnson, HOU; T.Y. 
                Hilton, IND; Robert 
                Woods, BUF; Josh 
                Gordon, CLE 
              This group of wide receivers could combine for some monster weeks, 
                especially if Josh Gordon gets his suspension reduced. At the 
                point where I was able to get Gordon – the 22nd round – 
                it was worth a shot. The upside is incredible and the downside 
                is I lost a 22nd-round pick.  
              I don’t think I have to tell you about what I’m getting 
                out of the first three receivers. Demaryius Thomas, Jordy Nelson 
                and Vincent Jackson are a strong set that could all be No. 1 wide 
                receivers for fantasy teams this season. Johnson may be stuck 
                in a questionable offense, but he’s still Andre Johnson, 
                after all.  
              T.Y. Hilton is the ultimate WR5 in a best ball that’s normally 
                drafted as a WR2 or WR3. He is too shaky to depend on to give 
                you weekly production, but when he has big weeks, they’re 
                really big weeks. Having a big game fifth wide receiver after 
                a strong core of four should set me up for a strong run. 
              Despite how loaded I appear to be, some depth is still necessary, 
                since lineups in this format require three wide receivers and 
                a flex. With byes and potential injuries, I needed at least one 
                more body to help fill in. Robert Woods has a chance to be a second-year 
                breakout in a young Bills offense. Woods and EJ Manuel seemed 
                to have a solid connection last year and it can only grow with 
                more time together. 
              TE: Charles 
                Clay, MIA; Delanie 
                Walker, TEN 
              My focus on early-round wide receivers and mid-round running 
                backs forced me ignore the tight end position until later on. 
                It turns out, waiting on the position didn’t end up hurting 
                me that much. In FFToday’s PPR rankings, Charles Clay and 
                Delanie Walker come in at 12th and 14th. Having two fringe TE1s 
                in best ball should give me solid overall scoring at the position. 
              K: Shayne 
                Graham, NO; Mason 
                Crosby, GB 
              In a standard draft I would always tend to wait as long as possible 
                to fill the kicker position. With the format of this league, I 
                thought it might be prudent to grab kickers from offenses that 
                should be very high scoring this season. Since it is best ball, 
                I grabbed two of them. Don’t ever grab two in a weekly league. 
              DEF: Baltimore; 
                Green 
                Bay; San 
                Diego 
              With the randomness of defensive scoring and my lack of control 
                over lineups week to week, I made a decision to grab three defenses 
                in this draft to increase my chances of having a solid score at 
                the position every week. 
              Final Thoughts 
              This team should be fun to follow. In terms of best ball, it 
                certainly has a lot of downside if any wide receiver injuries 
                hit me and the running backs all show why they were each available 
                so late. If this were a regular weekly management team, I think 
                I’d be in good shape. I would probably start my top four 
                wide receivers in the three receiver slots and flex, requiring 
                me to only come up with two running backs to start week-to-week. 
              This strategy requires some level of risk and a willingness to 
                start the season weak at running back. But with a few solid late-round 
                picks and a couple shrewd waiver moves during the season, the 
                strategy of waiting on running back could end up being a home 
                run in the long run of a fantasy season. 
               
              Suggestions, comments? E-mail 
                or find me on Twitter. 
               
             |