Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      






Mike Davis | Archive | Email |
Staff Writer


Incentivizing Engagement
Q & A: Week 10
11/12/15

Last Week’s Question: Does your league have unique procedures, penalties or prizes?

I ended last week’s column with a promise to reveal more of the oddball practices in Jason’s league. I already mentioned the prerogative of each year’s champion to institute a new rule for the league (pending a vote of approval). That was just the beginning of special privileges and responsibilities for the champ, who also “gets to name the last-place team the following season” and “must spend $20 on a gift bag for the last-place team.” Want more details? Of course you do:

This can be anything from $20 worth of toilet paper to a cache of dollar store schwag and/or highly inappropriate items. The unboxing is either filmed and distributed or occurs [at a league gathering].

But the champion isn’t the only one affected by other weird rules in Jason’s league, such as one introduced this season that has become known as “the Manning rule”: “If [your] team’s kicker outscores your starting QB in any given week, you owe $5 to the highest-scoring team that week.” Ouch. (And if my QB has to leave with an injury sustained in the first series in the game, double-ouch!)

The most interesting rule under consideration in Jason’s league makes me wonder whether Jimmy Wales is a participant:

Pending: The league gets to jointly create a Wikipedia page about the league champion's team/ownership/season.

Jason’s league has other, more serious rules designed to maintain competition throughout the fantasy season. We’ll look at those a bit later. For now though, let’s review some other unique practices, such as this brutal penalty in ADT’s league:

In my 12-man PPR money league, if you finish in last place you get kicked out of the league and shot down to the league our children play in. If you are the champion in that league you once again get to play with the adults the following season. In the event one of our children win: the open spot becomes available to someone outside of the two leagues.

The most unusual prize awarded to a league champion was mentioned by Phil, whose league has taken a page from the Masters Tournament: “We do a weekend-long draft event (golf, etc.) at a rental house. The champ not only gets first pick of bedrooms but he also sets the menu for draft night.”

Gary mentioned a number of oddball traditions that have evolved over the years in his league , including a bizarre fixation on actress Bea Arthur. The tradition from Gary’s league that I like best is the practice of placing side bets on which owner will be the first to attempt to draft a player who has already been taken. As I encountered one reference to alcohol after another in Gary’s note, it became clear that once you have placed a wager on which owner will be the first to select an already-claimed player, you go out of your way to get him drunk.

A similar alcohol-related provision was instituted in Phil’s league: “If you have a draft where there's lots of drinking goin' on, you simply must institute this one: If you try to draft a guy already taken (or in an auction, nominate an owned player), you take a shot!”

I’ll let a bass-ackward trophy tradition from Craig’s league carry us to the finish line in this section for reasons that will soon become obvious:

We are not a money league. We do throw in $10 a team at the start of the season to be divided 60/40 by the two Super Bowl competitors, but nobody really plays for that. About 10 years ago the start of the holiday season would cause some teams, even those still in playoff contention, to drop their game a little bit and on the flip side, those who thought they were out of it would do little to win or actually purposefully lose in order to advance their draft position the next year. I bought a Heisman-like bronze trophy and had it mounted on a marble base. The 4 sides or the base have brass plaques affixed. The Super Bowl winner has his name, his team’s name and the championship year engraved on the trophy and gets to keep the trophy until a new Super Bowl winner is crowned. The guys are much more interested in hoisting that trophy than they are in the $60.

At the same time I bought an equally large trophy with a marble base and brass plaques – and a roll of toilet paper mounted above the base on a spindle. This trophy was named the Benduever award in honor of our then league commissioner (and first recipient). The last-place team’s owner, team name, and year of infamy are engraved on that trophy. And, like the Super Bowl winner, that team owner keeps possession of that trophy until it is wrested away from him by a successor loser. EVERYONE works through to the end of the season not to have his name on that trophy.

How effective are the two trophies? Heading into week 9 NO ONE is out of playoff contention.


This Week’s Question: What’s the most effective technique you’ve encountered for incentivizing engagement from owners who are out of playoff contention? (Specificity encouraged.)

Although some of the responses I received to my question about “unique procedures, penalties, and prizes” were inexplicably weird, most of these idiosyncratic practices evolved for a very specific purpose: to keep fantasy owners engaged whether their teams are likely to advance to the playoffs or not (like Craig’s “trophy-of-shame”).

Consider this rule from Jason’s league: “$20 fine for incomplete roster. Commish fills game day roster w/ avail bench players” or this one from Phil’s league: “$40 fine for the last-place finisher (nothing like seeing a cellar dweller making add/drops in Week 13 to keep up the fight!).”

Obviously, there’s no perfect recipe for eliminating owner apathy. Each league has to engage this problem in its own way and on its own terms. I invite commissioners who are on the warpath against apathy to look back through the Q&A archives for all sorts of reader perspectives on this problem over the years.

However, this year, I want to mention Kevin’s dissatisfaction with an anti-apathy measure I have long advocated: a weekly prize for the high-scoring team. As Kevin explains:

I had a hard time getting my owners to go along with a weekly prize for the team with the highest score because it meant taking money away from the big purse. As one owner said, “You don’t play fantasy football to see who can put up the most points in Week 6. You play for the same reason NFL teams do: to win a championship.” I saw his point, but he eventually saw mine about using a weekly prize to keep people on top of their game even after a championship is out of reach. So we took $130 out of the purse to award $10 to the high-point scorer each week of the regular season.

That was dumb.

Nobody gives up on their fantasy team in September[, so] that “extra incentive” was no incentive at all. It was just a month’s worth of $10 fees that we stole from the league champion (whoever that turns out to be) for no good reason.

We’re changing this for next year. We don’t want to start handing out $10 to the high-scoring team any earlier than we have to. If we start our playoffs in Week 14, when should we start handing out weekly prize money?


To answer Kevin’s question as simply as possible, I think it’s probably safe to use Week 7 as the cut-off point. Apathy can creep in a little earlier than that for owners who get off to a horrible start, but I don’t think it becomes a major problem in the average league until Week 8.

I invite readers who have their own answers to Kevin’s question to email me with their responses (or to post them directly to the column). But I want to expand the question to make it more generally useful. Anti-apathy measures are always evolving, and since I got such detailed feedback from readers on unique procedures, penalties, and prizes, I hope to encourage detailed responses from leagues that strive to incentivize engagement. Kevin is right to observe that weekly high-score awards are mostly pointless in the early weeks of the season, so I look forward to learning about the particular tweaks that various leagues have made to maximize the effects of practices that I sometimes discuss in oversimplified ways.

I’m grateful to all the readers who responded to my last question whether I had a chance to quote them or not.

A.J. Green
Image by Tilt Creative (Ty Schiff)

Survivor Pool Picks - Week 10 (Courtesy of Matthew Schiff)

#3: Green Bay over Detroit: (4-5, Cin, Phi, AZ, ATL, KC, SEA, SD, NE, DEN)

Dear reader, take a look at my HORRIBLE pick’em pool record this year before you even think about using my third pick. Clearly, this slot hasn’t been the best pick by yours truly this season, but if you look at my record over almost 12 seasons with the Q&A column, I’m probably better than 75% overall with my picks during this time. With that in mind, it’s time to “pad my stats” by taking the Packers at home against a Lions team that is apparently in “permanent rebuilding” mode. While Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson are still the heart of this team, the franchise has lost something from the last two years – namely Ndamukong Suh – who is in Miami. Without the fear of a decent pass rush, Aaron Rodgers should be able to pick apart these division rivals en route to an easy victory at home. So if you haven’t used Green Bay yet, go ahead this week without the fear of being booted from your Survival pool like so many Denver and Atlanta fans last week.

#2: Philadelphia over Miami: (7-2, GB, Balt, NE, SEA, NYG, MIN, AZ, STL, ATL)

Dan Campbell knows all about playing against the Eagles in Philadelphia from his playing days with the NY Giants. This week, he brings his Dolphins to the Linc in hope of getting back on the winning track after losing two tough divisional matchups in a row. Campbell benefited from a wave of team emotion upon his promotion, but the crest of that wave is a distant memory at this point. If anything, the emotional edge in this Week 10 matchup should go to the Eagles, who will want to stake their claim to first place in the NFC East with a win at home (followed, in the minds of Philly’s faithful, by watching the Giants implode vs. the Patriots). Admittedly, this is not your father’s gimme, but as we get later in the season, you have to go out on a limb and hope that it doesn’t get sawed off behind you.

#1: Cincinnati over Houston: (7-2 NE, Mia, SEA, AZ, Atl, GB, STL, KC, NO):

The Bengals are atop the AFC North with an 8-0 record. They may be ready for a challenge, but they’re unlikely to get one this week against a struggling Texans team that will be playing without Arian Foster for the remainder of the season due to a torn Achilles. With Foster gone, we can expect the Texans to rely more than ever on the Brian Hoyer-DeAndre Hopkins connection that wins lots of games in fantasy football, but not very many in the NFL. The Texans move the ball efficiently with almost 400 yards per game, but they are being outscored by their opponents by almost a touchdown per game. Why should a defense that couldn’t stop Miami or Kansas City fare any better against the likes of Andy Dalton, A.J. Green, Tyler Eifert, and the 1-2 punch of Jeremy Hill and Giovanni Bernard? Look for Cincinnati to continue its “magical” season with a win over a Texans team that needs another year (and possibly a cloning procedure for J.J. Watt) to improve on its defense.


Mike Davis has been writing about fantasy football since 1999--and playing video games even longer than that. His latest novel (concerning a gamer who gets trapped inside Nethack after eating too many shrooms) can be found here.