<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving Up, Moving Down &#8211; Week 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Football Strategy, Advice, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim In Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim In Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave 2 points: #! Jacoby Ford. You move him down but fact is the guy was injured. Yes he is back but Ford admitted he is not 100%. You may be right about him. But I can&#039;t see how you can downgrade a guy who was injured. Secondly is Keller. I have seen other fantasy comments using your reasoning. The JETS however were winning when getting Keller the ball earlier this season. To use last 2 years in his productivity on the basis of seasonal analysis for 2011 is confusing to me. So what Keller shows up first 2 games of season evey year then Jets decide he is not worthy? Players have couple down games and alot of these fantasy sites just turn on them. You may be correct but I am predicting Keller has a good game Monday night against a defense (Miami) that has given up alot of points to TE. Jets should see that they were winning when Keller was having productive games. Of course Rex Ryan is more blowhard then great coach so we shall see...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave 2 points: #! Jacoby Ford. You move him down but fact is the guy was injured. Yes he is back but Ford admitted he is not 100%. You may be right about him. But I can&#8217;t see how you can downgrade a guy who was injured. Secondly is Keller. I have seen other fantasy comments using your reasoning. The JETS however were winning when getting Keller the ball earlier this season. To use last 2 years in his productivity on the basis of seasonal analysis for 2011 is confusing to me. So what Keller shows up first 2 games of season evey year then Jets decide he is not worthy? Players have couple down games and alot of these fantasy sites just turn on them. You may be correct but I am predicting Keller has a good game Monday night against a defense (Miami) that has given up alot of points to TE. Jets should see that they were winning when Keller was having productive games. Of course Rex Ryan is more blowhard then great coach so we shall see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Stringer</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Stringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Van Tieghem,
There&#039;s nobody else in Cleveland for McCoy to love, that&#039;s for sure.

@ Davey,
The Raiders seem to be betting on DHB and Moore and that&#039;s why I&#039;m no longer betting on Ford. Ford should have a couple of solid, sneaky games but that&#039;s about it.

@ Rocco,
Couldn&#039;t agree more but if defenses clamp down on Run DMC like the Texans did, then DHB might just be the WR to benefit the most.

@ Andrew,
I like Cook but one 80-yard bomb is padding the numbers you mention and that&#039;s why he&#039;s not moving up. 

@ Greg,
Doing the math, you gave up on a preseason consensus top 5 fantasy TE after Week 2? Would you have given up on CJ after Week 2? There&#039;s trigger happy and then there&#039;s TRIGGER HAPPY.

@ Cooper,
Baldwin&#039;s not looking bad but there are injury issues in Seattle at WR and TE and Doucet&#039;s targets came in a blowout so I&#039;m putting a big discount on them. As for Breaston and Cassel, as I noted, check out the Chiefs very favorable schedule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Van Tieghem,<br />
There&#8217;s nobody else in Cleveland for McCoy to love, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p>@ Davey,<br />
The Raiders seem to be betting on DHB and Moore and that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m no longer betting on Ford. Ford should have a couple of solid, sneaky games but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>@ Rocco,<br />
Couldn&#8217;t agree more but if defenses clamp down on Run DMC like the Texans did, then DHB might just be the WR to benefit the most.</p>
<p>@ Andrew,<br />
I like Cook but one 80-yard bomb is padding the numbers you mention and that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s not moving up. </p>
<p>@ Greg,<br />
Doing the math, you gave up on a preseason consensus top 5 fantasy TE after Week 2? Would you have given up on CJ after Week 2? There&#8217;s trigger happy and then there&#8217;s TRIGGER HAPPY.</p>
<p>@ Cooper,<br />
Baldwin&#8217;s not looking bad but there are injury issues in Seattle at WR and TE and Doucet&#8217;s targets came in a blowout so I&#8217;m putting a big discount on them. As for Breaston and Cassel, as I noted, check out the Chiefs very favorable schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about Doug Baldwin?  You also can&#039;t ignore Early Doucet&#039;s 16 targets.  I like either of them over Steve Breaston - the Chiefs are too up and down and I&#039;m not ready to trust Matt Cassel quite yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Doug Baldwin?  You also can&#8217;t ignore Early Doucet&#8217;s 16 targets.  I like either of them over Steve Breaston &#8211; the Chiefs are too up and down and I&#8217;m not ready to trust Matt Cassel quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EDog</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>EDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Little for sure. Just picked him up today. He&#039;ll be in this column next week!

BTW, editors, from the link on the front page, it&#039;s their wish, not there wish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Little for sure. Just picked him up today. He&#8217;ll be in this column next week!</p>
<p>BTW, editors, from the link on the front page, it&#8217;s their wish, not there wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dallas Clark officially benchable?? I dropped him 3 weeks ago and haven&#039;t regretted it for a moment.  Way to be on the ball there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallas Clark officially benchable?? I dropped him 3 weeks ago and haven&#8217;t regretted it for a moment.  Way to be on the ball there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moving Up, Moving Down Week 6 - FFToday.com &#124; This Week in Fantasy Football</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving Up, Moving Down Week 6 - FFToday.com &#124; This Week in Fantasy Football</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the WRs and all other positions click HERE.  Related Posts:Week 3 Sleepers of the Week &#8211; FFToolbox.comFantasy Points Allowed by Team [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the WRs and all other positions click HERE.  Related Posts:Week 3 Sleepers of the Week &#8211; FFToolbox.comFantasy Points Allowed by Team [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about any love for Jared Cook? I realize he&#039;s on a bye week but 15 targers, 150 yards and getting paydirt once the past two weeks. How is he not moving up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about any love for Jared Cook? I realize he&#8217;s on a bye week but 15 targers, 150 yards and getting paydirt once the past two weeks. How is he not moving up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocco</title>
		<link>http://www.fftoday.com/blog/2011/10/11/moving-up-moving-down-week-6-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fftoday.com/blog/?p=3992#comment-1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this point, all Raider WR&#039;s are a gamble. Moore was hot, then not, now DHB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, all Raider WR&#8217;s are a gamble. Moore was hot, then not, now DHB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
