Comments on: Facts and Advice You Can Take to the Bank

By: Darren McFadden

Darren McFadden — Sat, 17 Sep 2011 03:57:50 +0000

Keep up the good work on this website. I come here all the time and like the reading. cheers

By: telemachus

telemachus — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:57:39 +0000

About Tomlinson:

Yeah, I agree about your points, BUT the Jetswon’t be abandoning Shonn Greene; he will get his carries this year.

You should have mentioned something about Ahmad Bradshaw; he will be a serious FF player this year.

By: Dave Stringer

Dave Stringer — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:18:04 +0000

@ Coby
Regarding points 70 and 71, the Falcons did not add a big WR which means that Tony Gonzalez should get plenty of red zone targets once again in 2010. Douglas’ return should help the offense but his presence isn’t going to diminish Gonzalez’s touches in the red zone.

By: Dave Stringer

Dave Stringer — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:16:04 +0000

@ Ian
The comment is about which teams benefit from rotating through the divisions. In the AFC, the AFC West plays the AFC South and NFC West this year and that is easily the worst combination of defenses (on average) of the divisions the AFC East, Norht or South play against. That increases the fantasy value of players from the AFC West.
Can’t say I agree that the AFC South is one of the top two divisions overall. AFC East, AFC North, NFC East are all better, making the AFC South, at best, the fourth best division.

By: Coby Glass

Coby Glass — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:39:18 +0000

The Falcons have Harry Douglas coming back after missing his Rookie year with an injury- that is virtually like getting an extra draft pick and using it on a WR expected to start Game 1.

By: Ian

Ian — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:16:27 +0000

Re: #55…why is playing the AFC south beneficial to the AFC West? Colts, Texans, Titans and Jags = AFC South. Those aren’t easy teams. In fact, the AFC South could easily be argued as one of the top two divisions in the NFL. Is that a typo?

By: Dave Stringer

Dave Stringer — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:39:04 +0000

@ Seth F, JacksonP, Adam, Gary, Mike Surtel,
Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated.

@ TBone
You’re not being sarcastic with me, are you, TBone?

@ Monka
Monka, read 70 and 71 together. Those teams didn’t acquire big WRs so Gonzalez, Olsen and Celek should get plenty of red zone looks once again in 2010.

@ Van
Those players are definitely all in the same tier. I rank them Matthews, Greene, Benson. Chargers O is solid, Jets run it plenty. Bit concerned about Benson but he should definitely be solid.

@ Jay
Just pointing out that while Olsen is unlikely to post solid yardage totals, he should get some looks in the red zone. Definitely more useful in TD heavy leagues.

@ Steve Schwarz
Good points, Steve. Let’s see if Grant gets a few more of those TD’s this year.

@Expaperboy
Difficult to tailor each article to every league. In standard scoring leagues, kickers and defenses are unpredictable so I don’t spend much time ranking them.

@Hmmm,
The advice and facts in my column are unique and have been gathered since the end of last season. 50 bullet points wasn’t enough so 100 is the next logical number. If you bothered to read each article, it’s clear there is no plagiarism to be found. As for uniqueness, there are plenty of FF articles that list out points to consider.

@b,
If you’d like to point out something you disagree with, I’d be happy to respond. Thanks for reading.

@ John,
FF Today default scoring. Thanks for reading. Here’s the link: http://fftoday.com/stats/playerstats.php?Season=2009&GameWeek=&PosID=10&LeagueID=1&order_by=FFPtsPerG&sort_order=DESC

By: John

John — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:49:45 +0000

What color is the sky in your world that your scoring system gives Ben Roethlisberger the third most points per game last year? Try more like eighth or ninth.