Second Reads and Route Adjustments
10/30/08
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
The position with the most analyzable stats is wide receiver. The
primary route for most fantasy managers is to track receptions,
yards, and fantasy points per game average. Digging deeper generally
means accessing targets and yards per catch. Taking the analysis
a few steps further will actually help you more formally identify
the various ways a receiver functions in his offense. Understanding
his role will help you figure out which personnel adjustments at
the position may help or hurt your lineup as the second half of
the fantasy season takes shape.
The stats that reveal this information include target conversion
percentage (C%), targets per game (T/GM), and touchdown conversion
percentage (Td C%). These three pieces of information will be
combined with the typical receiving stats of value to reveal which
moves you should make at this fantasy position down the stretch.
| Top 36: Targets/Game |
| Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
| 11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
| 6. A.
Johnson |
7 |
83 |
56 |
772 |
2 |
89.2 |
12.7 |
67% |
2% |
13.8 |
11.9 |
| 22. D.
Bowe |
7 |
74 |
40 |
512 |
2 |
63.2 |
9 |
54% |
3% |
12.8 |
10.6 |
| 2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
| 8. S.
Smith (CAR) |
6 |
59 |
33 |
613 |
4 |
84.7 |
14.1 |
56% |
7% |
18.6 |
9.8 |
| 3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
| 30. W.
Welker |
7 |
67 |
49 |
466 |
1 |
54.5 |
7.8 |
73% |
1% |
9.5 |
9.6 |
| 17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
| 7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
| 12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
| 29. M.
Jones |
7 |
63 |
37 |
444 |
2 |
56.4 |
8.1 |
59% |
3% |
12 |
9 |
| 33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
| 31. P.
Burress |
6 |
50 |
28 |
356 |
3 |
53.6 |
8.9 |
56% |
6% |
12.7 |
8.3 |
| 1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
| 42. C.
Johnson |
7 |
57 |
32 |
312 |
2 |
43.2 |
5.4 |
56% |
4% |
9.8 |
8.1 |
| 14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
| 4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
| 34. A.
Bryant |
8 |
64 |
38 |
452 |
1 |
51.2 |
6.4 |
59% |
2% |
11.9 |
8 |
| 24. D.
Jackson |
7 |
56 |
32 |
505 |
1 |
61.5 |
8.8 |
57% |
2% |
15.8 |
8 |
| 13. T.
Owens |
8 |
64 |
30 |
431 |
5 |
75.6 |
9.5 |
47% |
8% |
14.4 |
8 |
| 5. C.
Johnson |
7 |
55 |
29 |
588 |
5 |
89.3 |
12.8 |
53% |
9% |
20.3 |
7.9 |
| 35. B.
Edwards |
7 |
55 |
22 |
371 |
2 |
49.1 |
7 |
40% |
4% |
16.9 |
7.9 |
| 23. M.
Muhammad |
8 |
62 |
37 |
507 |
2 |
62.7 |
7.8 |
60% |
3% |
13.7 |
7.8 |
| 26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
| 18. B.
Berrian |
7 |
54 |
28 |
517 |
3 |
70 |
10 |
52% |
6% |
18.5 |
7.7 |
| 32. S.
Breaston |
7 |
53 |
37 |
464 |
1 |
52.8 |
7.5 |
70% |
2% |
12.5 |
7.6 |
| 37. D.
Mason |
7 |
53 |
34 |
421 |
1 |
48.1 |
6.9 |
64% |
2% |
12.4 |
7.6 |
| 16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
| 15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
| 44. G.
Camarillo |
7 |
52 |
32 |
372 |
1 |
42.7 |
6.1 |
62% |
2% |
11.6 |
7.4 |
| 9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
| 41. M.
Harrison |
7 |
50 |
23 |
270 |
3 |
45 |
6.4 |
46% |
6% |
11.7 |
7.1 |
| 25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
| 43. S.
Holmes |
6 |
41 |
22 |
360 |
1 |
43 |
7.2 |
54% |
2% |
16.4 |
6.8 |
| 10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
| 20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
|
The first stat we’ll review in detail is targets per game
(T/GM). The table to the left ranks the top 36 receivers according
to T/GM, but also displays the other pertinent stats that will be
discussed later.
It’s clear that the players with the most targets per game
don’t necessarily have the best fantasy points per game
average. Of the top twelve T/GM receivers, five of them average
less than 10 points per game. Three of these five receivers –
Dwayne Bowe, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and Matt Jones – are arguably
the primary threat in offenses with line struggles to run the
ball and protect the passer. The Chiefs and Bengals both have
quarterback issues.
If you argue T.J. Houshmandzadeh isn’t the primary guy
in Cincinnati, then he also has something in common with the other
two receivers in the T/GM top twelve who are averaging less than
10 points per game. Houshmandzadeh, Eddie Royal, and Wes Welker
all serve as productive secondary options for their teams and
all three are underneath options for their quarterbacks –
averaging 10 yards or fewer per catch.
Of the twelve most targeted receivers, only three – Bowe,
Wayne, and Jones – have a conversion percentage below 60%.
This is a common sense stat: if you have reliable hands, your
quarterback will target you often.
Surprisingly, the lowest three converters on this list of 36
receivers are the venerable, Terrell Owens (47%), Marvin Harrison
(46%), and Braylon Edwards (40%). T.O. has the rep for inconsistent
hands, but Harrison and Edwards? Credit inconsistent play for
each offense to begin the season. Stick with Owens, who might
be a buy-low candidate relative to his preseason perception.
If the patchwork solution between Kellen Winslow and the Browns
holds up, Braylon Edwards could benefit. The attempts are there,
but the receptions aren’t. Marvin Harrison may have a strong
game or two for the rest of the year, but I wouldn’t count
on him returning to fantasy form unless the Colts find a situational
role for him where he can exploit his remaining skills in a new
way. I would think putting Harrison in the slot could be helpful,
but I’m not sure they have the personnel to replace Harrison’s
role on the outside to divert the focus of a starting corner.
| Top 36: Target Conversion
Percentage |
| Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
| 46. I.
Hilliard |
8 |
32 |
27 |
226 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.1 |
84% |
9% |
8.4 |
4 |
| 7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
| 33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
| 30. W.
Welker |
7 |
67 |
49 |
466 |
1 |
54.5 |
7.8 |
73% |
1% |
9.5 |
9.6 |
| 47. C.
Stuckey |
7 |
26 |
19 |
225 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.8 |
73% |
12% |
11.8 |
3.7 |
| 38. A.
Randle El |
8 |
46 |
33 |
409 |
1 |
47.4 |
5.9 |
72% |
2% |
12.4 |
5.8 |
| 17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
| 32. S.
Breaston |
7 |
53 |
37 |
464 |
1 |
52.8 |
7.5 |
70% |
2% |
12.5 |
7.6 |
| 49. H.
Baskett |
7 |
26 |
18 |
253 |
2 |
37.3 |
5.3 |
69% |
8% |
14.1 |
3.7 |
| 25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
| 6. A.
Johnson |
7 |
83 |
56 |
772 |
2 |
89.2 |
12.7 |
67% |
2% |
13.8 |
11.9 |
| 40. D.
Driver |
7 |
43 |
29 |
330 |
2 |
45.6 |
6.5 |
67% |
5% |
11.4 |
6.1 |
| 26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
| 48. B.
Stokley |
6 |
36 |
24 |
262 |
2 |
38.2 |
6.4 |
67% |
6% |
10.9 |
6 |
| 50. R.
Meachem |
7 |
12 |
8 |
244 |
2 |
36.4 |
5.2 |
67% |
17% |
30.5 |
1.7 |
| 14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
| 4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
| 20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
| 37. D.
Mason |
7 |
53 |
34 |
421 |
1 |
48.1 |
6.9 |
64% |
2% |
12.4 |
7.6 |
| 1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
| 28. D.
Avery |
6 |
33 |
21 |
347 |
2 |
56.5 |
9.4 |
64% |
6% |
16.5 |
5.5 |
| 3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
| 9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
| 15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
| 44. G.
Camarillo |
7 |
52 |
32 |
372 |
1 |
42.7 |
6.1 |
62% |
2% |
11.6 |
7.4 |
| 11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
| 2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
| 23. M.
Muhammad |
8 |
62 |
37 |
507 |
2 |
62.7 |
7.8 |
60% |
3% |
13.7 |
7.8 |
| 34. A.
Bryant |
8 |
64 |
38 |
452 |
1 |
51.2 |
6.4 |
59% |
2% |
11.9 |
8 |
| 29. M.
Jones |
7 |
63 |
37 |
444 |
2 |
56.4 |
8.1 |
59% |
3% |
12 |
9 |
| 16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
| 12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
| 10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
| 24. D.
Jackson |
7 |
56 |
32 |
505 |
1 |
61.5 |
8.8 |
57% |
2% |
15.8 |
8 |
| 42. C.
Johnson |
7 |
57 |
32 |
312 |
2 |
43.2 |
5.4 |
56% |
4% |
9.8 |
8.1 |
| 39. P.
Crayton |
8 |
41 |
23 |
334 |
2 |
46.5 |
5.8 |
56% |
5% |
14.5 |
5.1 |
|
In contrast, let’s check out the top 36 receivers that
make the most of their opportunities. What you’re going
to find here are a lot of solid #3 -#4 receivers or bye week options.
Only Anquan Boldin and Andre Johnson are double-digit fantasy
point producers and in the top twelve in terms of converting targets,
which should further underscore how good both are playing right
now.
You may not get much out of Ike Hilliard, Antwaan Randle El,
Chansi Stuckey, or Hank Baskett, but if your desperate for a receiver
these guys will at least give you something most weeks.
Wes Welker
is no longer “sneaky good,” but Lance
Moore, Steve
Breaston, and Eddie
Royal have the quarterback and surrounding options to give
you solid production without the marquee name. Plus, Royal and
Welker get enough targets each game to be productive options.
Houshmandzadeh and Breaston’s stats indicate the same, but quarterback
issues and the return to slot receiver status (respectively) lead
me to believe they’ve already peaked.
It’s obvious from this table that production and the highest
target conversion don’t always go hand in hand. Santana
Moss, Greg Jennings, Roddy White, and Larry Fitzgerald are all
in the middle to closer to the bottom of the pack I this category.
When you get your nose out of the stat column and watch a ballgame
you know these players are often targeted in situations with a
high degree of difficulty. Therefore, the conversion may not be
among the highest on the list, but they continue to get fed the
ball enough to produce among the best in the game.
There is a player with intriguing numbers that we should discuss.
Robert Meachem is averaging fewer than two targets per game, but
he’s converting enough to earn over five points per game.
When you see he’s averaging over 30 yards per catch, you
realize he’s a player to watch for the future but not likely
this season. A lot of owners are up and own on Meachem because
his production is high for a player with such limited looks. Personally,
I like what Meachem has done by working with David Patteon to
learn what’s needd to become a true professional. He’s
a long-term “buy” candidate in dynasty leagues as
long as he continues to exhibit this type of behavior.
| Top 36: Touchdown
Conversion Percentage |
| Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
| 50. R.
Meachem |
7 |
12 |
8 |
244 |
2 |
36.4 |
5.2 |
67% |
17% |
30.5 |
1.7 |
| 45. M.
Austin |
7 |
18 |
10 |
229 |
3 |
40.9 |
5.8 |
56% |
17% |
22.9 |
2.6 |
| 27. C.
Chambers |
6 |
33 |
16 |
273 |
5 |
57.4 |
9.6 |
48% |
15% |
17.1 |
5.5 |
| 7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
| 47. C.
Stuckey |
7 |
26 |
19 |
225 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.8 |
73% |
12% |
11.8 |
3.7 |
| 20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
| 36. N.
Washington |
7 |
31 |
16 |
290 |
3 |
48.4 |
6.9 |
52% |
10% |
18.1 |
4.4 |
| 16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
| 46. I.
Hilliard |
8 |
32 |
27 |
226 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.1 |
84% |
9% |
8.4 |
4 |
| 5. C.
Johnson |
7 |
55 |
29 |
588 |
5 |
89.3 |
12.8 |
53% |
9% |
20.3 |
7.9 |
| 21. I.
Bruce |
8 |
44 |
23 |
399 |
4 |
63.9 |
8 |
52% |
9% |
17.3 |
5.5 |
| 14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
| 19. D.
Henderson |
7 |
34 |
18 |
499 |
3 |
68.6 |
8.6 |
53% |
9% |
27.7 |
4.9 |
| 13. T.
Owens |
8 |
64 |
30 |
431 |
5 |
75.6 |
9.5 |
47% |
8% |
14.4 |
8 |
| 49. H.
Baskett |
7 |
26 |
18 |
253 |
2 |
37.3 |
5.3 |
69% |
8% |
14.1 |
3.7 |
| 15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
| 10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
| 1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
| 3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
| 4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
| 2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
| 8. S.
Smith |
6 |
59 |
33 |
613 |
4 |
84.7 |
14.1 |
56% |
7% |
18.6 |
9.8 |
| 12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
| 28. D.
Avery |
6 |
33 |
21 |
347 |
2 |
56.5 |
9.4 |
64% |
6% |
16.5 |
5.5 |
| 9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
| 31. P.
Burress |
6 |
50 |
28 |
356 |
3 |
53.6 |
8.9 |
56% |
6% |
12.7 |
8.3 |
| 41. M.
Harrison |
7 |
50 |
23 |
270 |
3 |
45 |
6.4 |
46% |
6% |
11.7 |
7.1 |
| 26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
| 48. B.
Stokley |
6 |
36 |
24 |
262 |
2 |
38.2 |
6.4 |
67% |
6% |
10.9 |
6 |
| 18. B.
Berrian |
7 |
54 |
28 |
517 |
3 |
70 |
10 |
52% |
6% |
18.5 |
7.7 |
| 25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
| 39. P.
Crayton |
8 |
41 |
23 |
334 |
2 |
46.5 |
5.8 |
56% |
5% |
14.5 |
5.1 |
| 40. D.
Driver |
7 |
43 |
29 |
330 |
2 |
45.6 |
6.5 |
67% |
5% |
11.4 |
6.1 |
| 17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
| 33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
| |